Sunday, September 7, 2008

Poll: Mexicans view U.S. political leaders negatively

WASHINGTON — Populace sentiment in United Mexican States have turned sharply against the United States over the past decade, and many in America's southern neighbour now throw strongly negative positions of President Shrub and the campaigners vying to replace him, a public sentiment study released Thursday revealed.

A Pew Global Attitudes Survey of citizens in United Mexican States and 23 other states establish that 47 percentage of Mexicans have got a positive position of the United States, down from 68 percentage a decennary ago. Nearly half of that diminution — 9 per centum points — came since last year, when an anti-immigrant backlash in United States inflamed some occupants of Mexico.

The study did not effort to inquiry Mexicans about their motives behind their beliefs, but the negative temper is clearly focused on American political leaders.

Just 16 percentage of Mexicans have got assurance in President Bush, a former boundary line state governor who professes great affectionateness for Mexico. Only 29 percentage of Mexicans have got assurance in Democratic presidential campaigner Barack Obama, and 19 percentage respond favorably to Republican rival Toilet McCain.

"The cynicism about the United States runs pretty deeply" in Mexico, said Saint Andrew Kohut, president of the Pew Research Center. "They cognize us fairly well, and they probably have got doubts."

The determinations were portion of a comprehensive study of human race mental attitudes on assorted political and economical topics. More than 24,000 people were interviewed on six continents.

While other nations' positions of the U.S. soured after the Republic Of Iraq invasion in 2003, the diminution in Mexican support for United States have come up more than recently, amid growing anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States and a crackdown by the Shrub disposal on undocumented workers.

Among all the states surveyed, United Mexican States was more than disbelieving of the two campaigners for president than any outside the Moslem world. The lone states that were more than doubtful of Obama than United Mexican States were Islamic Republic Of Pakistan (10 percent), Turkey (20 percent) and Jordan River (22 percent).

Only Pakistan, Turkey and Republic Of Indonesia were more than hostile to McCain.

Just 37 percentage of Mexican citizens believe that the new president will change U.S. foreign policy for the better, the study said — one of the most pessimistic appraisals in the world.

The harshly negative Mexican percepts of McCain are particularly surprising because the Grand Canyon State senator have consistently won a bulk of Mexican-American votes in his statewide races. What's more, he was the primary Republican patron of comprehensive in-migration statute law that would have got given illegal workers a nerve pathway to eventual U.S. citizenship.

Resentment against Uncle Surface-To-Air Missile is widespread South of the Rio De Janeiro Grande. Only 17 percentage of Mexicans believe the United States acts upon their state in a positive way. One in five Mexicans believe the U.S. acts upon their economic system for the better.

About one-half of Mexicans believe of the U.S. arsenic a partner; 31 percentage see United States an enemy.

Saturday, September 6, 2008

Obama, Clinton plan visits this week to North Carolina

Officials with Democratic presidential campaigner Edmund Hillary Rodham Clinton's political campaign downplayed the importance of the North Carolina primary on Monday, as both she and Barack Obama announced programs to tree stump in the state later this week.

Clinton spokesman Leslie Howard Wolfson said the political campaign doesn't see North Carolina a must-win state. He answered a inquiry about North Carolina with a focusing on Pennsylvania, calling it an ethnically, racially and demographically diverse state that is critical to Democrats in the November election.

"I would inquire why the Obama political campaign is having such as a difficult clip competing in one of the most of import states in the nation," Wolfson said during a conference phone call with reporters.

Former President Bill Bill Clinton said last hebdomad during a political campaign halt in suburban Walter Raleigh that the nominating race may come up down to North Carolina. Respective political campaign perceivers have got said the state is a must-win for Clinton.

"It's not good adequate for her to have got a win in Keystone State and then turn around and lose in North Carolina," said seasoned Democratic strategian Bill Carrick, who is not working with either candidate. "She necessitates to basically win everything that's left on the calendar."

Pennsylvania's April 22 primary volition apportion 158 delegates. North Carolina ballots two hebdomads later, dividing up 115 delegates, the last triple-digit draw available to the candidates.

Obama currently takes Bill Clinton by 121 delegates, although neither volition be able to win the nomination without the aid of Democratic superdelgates _ the political party leadership who can vote for whomever they choose.

Obama, who visited Fayetteville and The Queen City last Wednesday, will host a town hallway meeting in Greensboro on Wednesday afternoon. Greensboro Mayor Yvonne Samuel Johnson endorsed Obama on Monday, saying he can convey people together to make change.

The Bill Clinton political political campaign announced just proceedings later that the New House Of York senator would campaign in the state on Thursday, but functionaries did not immediately let go of any details.

Campaign functionaries also said they have got not yet agreed to a projected argument on April 19 in North Carolina, but that they anticipate inside information of planned arguments to come up out soon.

Andy Taylor, a professor of political scientific discipline at North Carolina State University, said Obama's record among blacknesses and in southern states do him the favourite in North Carolina. Because of that, Deems Taylor said the Bill Clinton political campaign desires to set up a narration focusing on their success in big battlefield states, such as as Buckeye State and Pennsylvania.

"They desire to do certain that they deject outlooks in North Carolina," he said. Keep up to day of the month with all the news! Try our , , and our Prime Minister Newscast every weekday at 3:00.

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Nigeria: Will the Court Ever Void a Presidential Election in Nigeria? - AllAfrica.com

Jiti OgunyeLagos

By the unprecedented unrecorded telecast of the bringing by the Presidential Election Request Tribunal, of the judgement in the amalgamate requests of General Muhammadu Buhari and Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, respectively of the ANPP and AC, against the election of President Umar Genus Musa Yar' Adua, on Tuesday 26th of February 2008, and the extended coverage of the judgement in the black and white media, the general populace have been able to grip the inside information of the judgment.

However, from a lawsuit reappraisal angle, it may be too early to make a thorough "finding by finding, and retention by holding" analysis of the judgment. This is because the judgement (both the Pb and concurring) is not yet available in the law studies for a careful and punctilious digestion. All the same, given what is known of the judgment, from the broadcast and black and white mass media report, it is safe to make its concise review, pending a more than luxuriant reappraisal when the judgement is published in the law reports.

Overall, it is our considered position that the judgement of the Court of Appeal, acting as the Tribunal, as learned as it certainly is, and as obvious as the industry that went into its readying is, is an unfortunate reversal of the modest advancement that have been recorded in recent clip in election request lawsuits under Nigerian law.

The judgement is dogmatically legalistic. It merely followed in the footfalls of the Awolowo volt Shagari, Falae volt Obasanjo and Buhari volt Obasanjo precedents, without heeding the age long adjudicative warning that in the application of judicial lawsuits in point and rules of law, facts of cases, which are distinguishable, should not be treated as one and the same. In Buhari volt Obasanjo( 2005), 13 NWLR. Pt. 941, 1 at Pp 308-309, parities G-C; 311,and paras. D-E, the Supreme Court had held that "an order of cancellation or nullification of the Presidential election should not be made by a tribunal or court without clear, positive believable and overpowering grounds led to the consequence that the full election was totally flawed nationwide; and that the behavior of the election was in breach of major and very cardinal commissariat of the Electoral Act. In the blink of an eye case, although the plaintiffs in error sought the scene aside of the full election on the evidence inter alia of violence, bullying and breach as of the Electoral Act, they failed to demo who was responsible for the force and intimidation, or how the alleged breach as of the Electoral Act affected the full consequence of the election, including the result accredited to the 1st Appellant"

The Tribunal, in our view, did no more than than than to throw fast to that decision, even when the fortune were different, and the law-breaking of fraud in the contested 2007 election was more grievously blatant. The judgement unsympathetically denies the painful world of our corporate experience during the behavior of the April 14, 2007 Presidential Election. Our intuition is that the Court took a decision, in line with existing precedents, not to invalidate the consequence of the Presidential Election; and having taken that decision, it made certain that the respective pieces of grounds of corrupt patterns in the election and that of non-compliance with the commissariat of the Electoral Act, 2006, that were led at the trial of the petitions, were roundly rejected or dismissed as deficient to upturn the consequence of the election. If we were right in our suspicion, then the Tribunal, with profound regard to their Lordships, did not make right by the Nigerian people.

If, in the thought of the Tribunal, it is, contextually, unwise, unrealistic and inconvenient to invalidate the consequence of the election, the Court should have got got said so in apparent language, after accepting, as proved, believable and unimpeachable evidence that were led at the trial to demo that the election was marred by fraud and irregularities.

The Court could have rationalized a refusal to invalidate the consequence on the grounds of the paramount necessity to exert judicial powerfulnesses judiciously, of the bounding duty of the bench to stabilise the polity, and of the important function of the bench in the saving of law and order, which a nullification of the consequence of the election might undermine.

Relevant Links

The Court could have got reasoned that upturning the consequence of the election might jeopardize national security and endanger democratic administration itself. The Court could even have got added that it had no case in point to follow, either in Federal Republic Of Nigeria or in the remainder of the Commonwealth, in voiding the all of import consequence of the presidential election; and that it was not prepared to make one. If the Court had taken this line of approach, it would have got been subjected to rough unfavorable judgment for displaying a deficiency of courage, when it ought to distribute justness without fearfulness or favour, affectionateness or sick will.

However, in our low opinion, it is better for a bench to be accused of exhibiting rational and circumspective timidness in dealing with a hyper-sensitive matter of a presidential election revocation in a newcomer democracy, such as as ours, than for it to be accused of hypocrisy.

There is a general agreement of local and international sentiments that the April 2007 Elections in Federal Republic Of Federal Republic Of Nigeria were the worst conducted elections since Nigeria returned to civil regulation in 1999. Local and foreign election monitoring devices testified to this fact in their vituperative reports. The behavior of the elections was said not to be in consonant rhyme with regional standards, allow alone international standards. The mass media reflected this fact.

Page 1 of 3

1

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Obama, Clinton plan visits this week to North Carolina

Officials with Democratic presidential campaigner Edmund Hillary Rodham Clinton's political campaign downplayed the importance of the North Carolina primary on Monday, as both she and Barack Obama announced programs to tree stump in the state later this week.

Clinton spokesman Leslie Howard Wolfson said the political campaign doesn't see North Carolina a must-win state. He answered a inquiry about North Carolina with a focusing on Pennsylvania, calling it an ethnically, racially and demographically diverse state that is critical to Democrats in the November election.

"I would inquire why the Obama political campaign is having such as a difficult clip competing in one of the most of import states in the nation," Wolfson said during a conference phone call with reporters.

Former President Bill Bill Clinton said last hebdomad during a political campaign halt in suburban Walter Raleigh that the nominating race may come up down to North Carolina. Respective political campaign perceivers have got said the state is a must-win for Clinton.

"It's not good adequate for her to have got a win in Keystone State and then turn around and lose in North Carolina," said seasoned Democratic strategian Bill Carrick, who is not working with either candidate. "She necessitates to basically win everything that's left on the calendar."

Pennsylvania's April 22 primary volition apportion 158 delegates. North Carolina ballots two hebdomads later, dividing up 115 delegates, the last triple-digit draw available to the candidates.

Obama takes Bill Clinton by 121 delegates, although neither volition be able to win the nomination without the aid of Democratic superdelgates _ the political party leadership who can vote for whomever they choose.

Obama, who visited Fayetteville and The Queen City last Wednesday, will host a town hallway meeting in Greensboro on Wednesday afternoon. Greensboro Mayor Yvonne Samuel Johnson endorsed Obama on Monday, saying he can convey people together to make change.

The Bill Clinton political political campaign announced just proceedings later that the New House Of York senator would campaign in the state on Thursday. And the former president said he would go back Friday to North Carolina. No inside information were released immediately on either appearance.

Campaign functionaries also said they have got not yet agreed to a projected argument on April 19 in North Carolina, but that they anticipate inside information of planned arguments to come up out soon.

Andy Taylor, a professor of political scientific discipline at North Carolina State University, said Obama's record among blacknesses and in southern states do him the favourite in North Carolina. Because of that, Deems Taylor said the Bill Clinton political campaign desires to set up a narration focusing on their success in big battlefield states, such as as Buckeye State and Pennsylvania.

"They desire to do certain that they deject outlooks in North Carolina," he said. Keep up to day of the month with all the news! Try our , , and our Prime Minister Newscast every weekday at 3:00.

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Bill Clinton assures Puerto Rico that American election matters to islanders

: Bill Bill Clinton assured Puerto Ricans that the American presidential election substances to the U.S. Caribbean Sea territory, urging them Wednesday to turn out in big Numbers to back up his married woman in a weekend primary.

Sunday's presidential primary, the island's first in nearly three decades, have brought the focusing of U.S. political relation to an island where people generally make not place with any mainland political party and cannot ballot in the general election.

But the former U.S. president said the election of Sen. Edmund Hillary Bill Clinton would convey of import alterations for education, wellness attention and energy policy on the island.

"It counts to Puerto Anti-Racketeering Law who acquires elected," Bill Bill Clinton told pupils at a photojournalism workshop. "Puerto Anti-Racketeering Law can have got a very of import voice in the election."

With 55 delegates at stake, Sen. Barack Obama theoretically could clinch the nomination. Bill Clinton is counting on a triumph to support her claim to have got won the bulk of popular ballots project in all Democratic contests. Today on IHT.com

Turnout is high for elections in Puerto Rico, where political political parties are defined by their place on the island's unsettled human relationship with the United States.

But the U.S. primary makes not look to have got got generated the same excitement; events involving Bill Clinton and Obama have not attracted more than than a couple hundred people.

Hillary Clinton, who recently finished a three-day campaign swing through Puerto Rico, will go back on Friday and remain through the primary Sunday, her hubby said.

The former president and his girl Chelsea stressed the candidate's committedness to instruction Wednesday as they addressed students.

"I believe Edmund Hillary have the best program to assist all immature people acquire an education," Bill Clinton said.

Monday, September 1, 2008

Obama campaign is flush with donations / McCain stays with public funding, limiting spending

sfgate_get_fprefs();

(06-20) 04:00 PDT American Capital --

Freed from a serious fundraising constraint, Democratic presidential campaigner Barack Obama is positioned to mount a general election political campaign on a scale of measurement the state have never seen, fueled by 100s of billions of dollars in private donations.

By rejecting public funding Thursday, Obama now confronts no legal disbursement bounds after he emerges from the Democratic National Convention in August and moves to the concluding phase of the race against the presumptive Republican nominee, Toilet McCain.

Obama turned down $84.1 million in federal dollars in opting out of the federal system - the first major-party candidate to make so since it started in 1976. But his political campaign is betting it will accumulate far more than than that from his donors.

The Prairie State senator means to utilize the other money to redraw the electoral map. He will run telecasting advertisements in traditionally Republican states where he trusts to vie and deploy field trading operations in topographic points Democrats are not supposed to win.

"It lets him to travel broader and deeper than any campaigner have been able to make from a fiscal basis," said Don Sipple, a Republican political strategist.

McCain said Thursday he would accept public financing, meaning he will be restricted to $84.1 million in direct disbursement in the two calendar months between the Republican convention and election day.

He accused Obama of breakage a promise to stay by the federal disbursement limit.

"This is a large deal, a large deal," McCain said. "He have completely reversed himself and gone back, not on his word to me, but the committedness he made to the American people."

Though Obama's determination made strategical sense, it left some good authorities groupings discouraged, predicting it would only fuel the money pursuit in politics. Complicating substances for Obama, he wrote in a political campaign questionnaire last November that he was committed to public financing. His statement, however, left some wriggle room.

"It's a mistake; I'm sure he's thinking more than of his short-term advantage than the long-term success of his reform program," said Steve Weissman, associate manager for policy at the Political Campaign Finance Institute. "Even though he's for fixing the public support system, this could assist gnaw support for that objective."

Obama's political campaign said the determination to reject public funding was tough. It is rooted in the odd success Obama have enjoyed in raising money. Through the end of April, Obama have brought in more than than $265 million, compared to less than $97 million for McCain, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

Under the public funding system, McCain can go on to raise and pass as much as he desires until he goes the Republican Party campaigner at the September convention. At that point, the Grand Canyon State senator can pass only the $84.1 million from a federal exchequer fund. Taxpayers boot into the monetary fund by voluntarily checking off a $3 part on their taxation returns.

Obama's already deep pool of about 1.4 million givers is expected to swell. He is now absorbing New House Of York Sen. Edmund Hillary Rodham Clinton's fundraising machinery, which will supply a jolt.

Obama's senior staff met in Windy City on Thursday with a half-dozen of Clinton's top fundraisers, and Bill Bill Clinton have called on 100 of her top fundraisers to ran into with her and Obama adjacent hebdomad in Washington.

Obama is also in a strong place because nearly half his givers have got given less than $200, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Contributions to the general election are capped at $2,300. So Obama is free to go back to his little givers and inquire for more.

Chris Kofinis, a Democratic strategian who worked for Toilet Edwards' 2008 presidential campaign, predicted that Obama could raise and pass $200 million in the post-convention time period alone.

Evan Tracey, caput of the nonpartisan Political Campaign Media Analysis Group, said Obama's scheme against Bill Clinton in the Keystone State primary foreshadowed what he might make to weaken McCain. Obama military units did not anticipate to beat out her, but they spent so much that Bill Clinton was compelled to consume her resources to continue victory.

"He can perplex McCain campaign's electoral math," said Tracey. "They can seek to do any state in the state competitive."